Date: Tue, 29 Jun 1999 18:42:46 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Regparm and asm statements.. what now?
In-Reply-To: <3778E043.D8D5F4@inti.gov.ar>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990629184054.18841S-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Tue, 29 Jun 1999, salvador wrote:

> > It has little chance of replacing the default libraries, simply
> > because every third-party toolkit out there would have to be
> > recompiled to match it.
> 
> No if you specify the calling convention in the headers, which BTW should be
> specified anyways!

What happens if someone compiles a program without including the headers 
that declare the prototype?

According to ANSI C, users can legitimately do that, and still assume 
they get a working program.