Date: Thu, 24 Jun 1999 12:03:10 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: salvador <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>
cc: "pavenis AT lanet DOT lv" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-2.95 benchmark
In-Reply-To: <199906231532.LAA17753@delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990624120221.25071H-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 23 Jun 1999, salvador wrote:

>   I tried the BYTE benchmarks with gcc 2.95 (june snapshot), even when it
> isn't much better than other versions is overall the best for both Pentium
> and K6 processors.

Did anybody try to change the default section alignment in Binutils to
8 bytes, and see if that improves performance?