Date: Tue, 22 Jun 1999 09:39:20 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: gcc-crash - and a possible solution
In-Reply-To: <199906211838.OAA28570@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990622093842.25569M-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 21 Jun 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:

> libc.a is one of the last things linked.  In a large program like cc1,
> even the earliest libc function could have a huge address.

Of course!  I don't know why did I think it should be low; probably
some vague memory from debugging small test programs.  Sorry for
posting nonsense.