Date: Mon, 21 Jun 1999 14:38:17 -0400
Message-Id: <199906211838.OAA28570@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990621090535.17143C-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Mon, 21 Jun 1999 09:07:44 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: gcc-crash - and a possible solution
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990621090535 DOT 17143C-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> On second thought, there's something else strange here: the address of
> `free' is abnormally high.  Usually, it lives somewhere in the 0x1NNN
> region, because the startup code calls it.

libc.a is one of the last things linked.  In a large program like cc1,
even the earliest libc function could have a huge address.