From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv Message-ID: To: "Erik Berglund" , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Wed, 16 Jun 1999 20:25:32 +0300 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Re: gcc-crash - and a possible solution In-reply-to: X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.11) Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk On 16 Jun 99, at 18:25, Erik Berglund wrote: > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > I think we need to investigate further, at least to know where does it > > crash, exactly. > > I agree on that. Would it be possible for you to rebuild GCC 2.7.2.1 with > DJGPP 2.01 on your site and use my register dump (posted on 14 Jun 1999) > to tell where the code fails? I'm afraid it would be rather difficult to get identical binaries. Therefore I think we should in future either leave binaries not stripped or put not stripped binaries somewhere. > Otherwise, I can install for instance GCC 2.8.1 with DJGPP 2.02 and try to > reproduce the error. I built last binaries of gcc-2.8.1 using beta version of DJGPP-2.02. Therefore also it will be difficult to reproduce them exactly. However there is one possibility. I'm going to make available DJGPP binaries of todays snapshot of gcc-2.95 prerelesea (egcs-19990616) which appears to be rather stable (I used slightly patched previous snapshot for my own programs and also compiling prerelease itself, built rhtvision-1.06 and it works, etc.). There were one problem (#pragma pack() were broken but this is now fixed) So I suggest to try this version. I'll make at least C and C++ compiler binaries available at http://www.lanet.lv/~pavenis/djgpp.html Currently there are stripped binaries of 8 June snapshot, but after short testing I'll put the 16th June snapshot binaries there (without stripping them) Andris