Date: Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:45:20 -0400
Message-Id: <199906091545.LAA07094@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: rudd AT cyberoptics DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990609113455.11862J-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Wed, 9 Jun 1999 11:36:12 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: libm sources from cyberoptics
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990609113455 DOT 11862J-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> > Can we count on the coprocessor being in round-to-nearest mode?
> 
> We probably can, if we document that.  DJ?

We initialize it that way, and all the other functions that need it
specific ways (floor, ceil) do preserve the old state.  I think we can
count on it being what we want, and if the user changes it, caveat
user.