Message-ID: <19990607123834.B25332@tabor.ta.jcu.cz>
Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 12:38:34 +0200
From: Jan Hubicka <hubicka AT ta DOT jcu DOT cz>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: egcs-19990602 (gcc-2.95 prerelease) binaries for testing
References: <B0000089535 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.93i
In-Reply-To: <B0000089535@stargate.astr.lu.lv>; from pavenis@lanet.lv on Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 12:21:35PM +0300
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, Jun 07, 1999 at 12:21:35PM +0300, pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:
> We could expect release of gcc-2.95 after not so long time. Therefore
> I have built 2 June snapshot of egcs for DJGPP and made binaries of 
> C and C++ compilers are available for testing.
Great! Thats one of thinks I wanted to do this week...
> 
> http://www.lanet.lv/~pavenis/gcc295snap.zip  - C compiler
> http://www.lanet.lv/~pavenis/gpp295snap.zip  - C++ compiler + libstdcxx.a
> http://www.lanet.lv/~pavenis/lgp295snap.zip   - libgpp.a built with this compiler
> 
> Please test them (I'll do the same).
> 
> My preliminary results
> 	- I tested one example I had to use -frepo with egcs-1.1.2. Now works 
>        without it (example with  rope that caused linker errors earlier)
>      - exceptions seems to work
>      - compiler is able to rebuild itself
> 
> About building:
> 	No /dev/env (or similar) hacks used. The idea how to force $DJDIR
>       into prefix was "stolen" from GPC sources (thanks GPC developers for
>       hont)
How large are the changes necessary to build egcs on djgpp? Would be possible
to put those changes directly to the egcs tree? I would like to build egcs
myself sometimes and problems with patching tree around always stops
me from this idea...

Honza
> 
> Andris