Date: Mon, 7 Jun 1999 09:48:06 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender: eliz AT is
To: Charles Sandmann <sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: __dpmi_simulate_real_mode_procedure_retf_stack
In-Reply-To: <9906031553.AA16649@clio.rice.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990607094736.18114I-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 3 Jun 1999, Charles Sandmann wrote:

> > So to fix this, we need to right-shift the argument before putting it in 
> > ECX.  Then the docs could be left alone.  Alternatively, we could change 
> > the docs to say "words" and change the code to use MOVSW instead of MOVSB 
> > when copying to the PM stack.
> 
> I would prefer the later, so the wrapper function is similar to the DPMI spec.

Done.  Thanks for the feedback.