From: Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Message-Id: <199906021028.MAA06902@mars.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject: Re: cwsdpmi r5
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 1999 12:28:11 +0200 (MET DST)
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com (DJGPP-WORKERS)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990602131518.13112B-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Jun 2, 99 01:16:39 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

Eli said:
> If the 1.0 support is included, perhaps it is better to add a 3rd 
> executable that was built with that support enabled, instead of ifdef'ing 
> it away.

Well, the 1.0 thing isn't done (as far as I know). But there is some work 
done, which I discovered when I had started to implement some things. 
Hence I ask this so I can (when/if I have time and inclination) work on 
1.0 support, without redoing something that has already been done. 


Right,

							MartinS