From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <9906011347.AA15174@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: __dpmi_simulate_real_mode_procedure_retf_stack
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii)
Date: Tue, 1 Jun 1999 08:47:37 -0600 (CDT)
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990601094401.19912N-100000@is> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Jun 1, 99 09:44:50 am
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL20]
Content-Type: text
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I suggest this should be documentation defect and the code stay the
way it is, so working code does not get the stack size cut in half.

> The source code of __dpmi_simulate_real_mode_procedure_retf_stack is
> attached below.  Unless I'm missing something, it passes the number of
> *bytes* on the stack in ECX, whereas the DPMI Spec says we need to
> pass the number of 16-bit *words* (see the excerpt below).