From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
Message-ID: <14fa509.2479b3f4@aol.com>
Date: Sun, 23 May 1999 15:41:40 EDT
Subject: Re: New Keyword for C
To: snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com (Mark E.)
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Subj:	 Re: New Keyword for C
To:	snowball3 AT bigfoot DOT com (Mark E.)

Dear Mark E.,

On 05-23-99 at 12:58:01 EST you wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, 22 May 1999 Kbwms AT aol DOT com wrote:
> >
> > > I understand from CUJ that a new keyword in C is in the works -
> > > restrict.  An article in their July issue (to be published in June)
> > > has a description.
> >
> > No.  But perhaps somebody on djgpp-workers knows.
> >
>
> gcc 2.95 will support it. The intent of the restrict qualifier is to aid in
> optimization. Pointers with the 'restrict' qualifier cannot point to the
> same object.

> BTW, you can pick up a copy of the latest available draft at:
> www.c9x.org
>

Also defined there are:

_Bool
_Complex
_Imaginary


When will gcc x.yy support these?


K.B. Williams