Date: Mon, 19 Apr 1999 13:45:41 -0400
Message-Id: <199904191745.NAA02062@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990418145526.22615w-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Sun, 18 Apr 1999 14:56:04 +0300 (IDT))
Subject: Re: fnmatch: GNU's and ours
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 990418145526 DOT 22615w-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> GNU fnmatch uses FNM_CASEFOLD, while we define FNM_NOCASE.  DJ, didn't
> you tell that FNM_NOCASE is Posix?  If so, does it mean that GNU's
> version doesn't comply?  I find that hard to believe.

POSIX only defines FNM_NOESCAPE, FNM_PATHNAME, and FNM_PERIOD.