Sender: nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID: <370E4124.D6F9387B@cartsys.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Apr 1999 11:04:20 -0700
From: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.08 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.5 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: fflush question
References: <199904082241 DOT SAA27805 AT mccoy2 DOT ECE DOT McGill DOT CA>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Alain Magloire wrote:

> > So do these systems have serious bugs in scanf, or is there a subtle bug
> > in the test that I missed?
> 
> Yes. In your second test your doing 2 fscanf(), and the printf()
> is missing an argument.  I run this On Solaris, QNX, SunOS with
> no problems .i.e no need for fsync().

Duuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuh.  Wow, do I feel dumb.

Okay, new results are on their way, this time without the benefit of
pseudocode. :)
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com