Message-ID: <001101be7f64$5d4f7c60$b4033bd4@default> From: "Laurynas Biveinis" To: Subject: Re: Fw: LBInstDJ - second, improved version Date: Mon, 5 Apr 1999 14:58:21 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-4" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3612.1700 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3612.1700 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com -----Original Message----- From: DJ Delorie To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: 1999 m. Balandis 5 d. 14:45 Subject: Re: Fw: LBInstDJ - second, improved version > >> I agree that for everybody's safety a non-LFN directory is better, but >> having an installer insist on that is IMHO a Bad Thing, 'cause >> somebody might know what they are doing. It might be a better idea to >> check whether DJGPP.ENV is accessible via the DJGPP variable setting. How can I do it in the installer? When DJGPP is not set and DJGPP.ENV does not exist? > >Perhaps it should warn if it detects a LFN install directory, and >require the user confirm their choice, after warning that it may not >work unless the user really knows what they're doing? LBInstDJ will do so in next version. Before 0.2 release I was planning to completely forbid installing in LFN dir, but commented it out in last minute before uploading so now user can install in LFN dir without any warning. IMHO, going from one extreme to another wasn't good thing. Laurynas Biveinis