From: "Laurynas Biveinis" To: Subject: Fw: LBInstDJ - second, improved version Date: Wed, 31 Mar 1999 06:51:42 +0200 Message-ID: <01be7b32$2b9949c0$LocalHost@Laurynas> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-4" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.71.1712.3 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.71.1712.3 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com -----Original Message----- From: DJ Delorie To: lauras AT softhome DOT net Date: 1999 m. Kovas 31 d. 00:07 Subject: Re: LBInstDJ - second, improved version > >You should send these to djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, not just me >personally. OK, I do it. BTW, what is it? Mailing list for DJGPP developers? > >> * If user wants it, registry is updated to disable numeric tails in SFN. > >I think this should be the default. I'm not even sure if an option to >do otherwise would be useful. Well, it *is* default (at least user is told so) But I have to ask, because after registry update user must restart computer and run LBInstDJ again. So he will run into the same question. > >> * added check if LBInstDJ is running under DOS 7 but not in DOS box under >> Windows 9x. > >Why? Because user will have trouble when trying to run DJGPP from Windows then. And LBInstDJ cannot update registry from pure DOS. But it's OK to install in pure DOS 7 if user will run DJGPP only there. Please correct me if I am wrong. > >> * LBInstDJ now updates autoexec.bat if it does not find FPU > >This shouldn't be needed; libc auto-detects the FPU. > >> * added check against LFN in installation path. Works only in DOS box under >> Win95 / Win98 > >Better to use a open/read test, since there are LFN drivers for >OpenDOS and WinNT, but they're optional. What open/read test? > >> * added check against installing to "/dev" directory > >Good. > >> * changed DPMI server from CWSDPMI to PMODE/DJ so LBInstDJ.exe now is a >> standalone program > >Cool, but beware that there are a few places where pmode doesn't work. >I can't remember them off the top of my head, though. I think a >self-extracting zip with two binaries and a readme.txt is fine. You >might want to name the binary "install.exe" or something obvious like >that. > >> Now question before releasing v0.2 - did I prepare my 0.1 zips good? > >* You forgot the manifests >* Please don't use mixed case in file names - use lower case only. >* Why use unzip? Why not use djtar, which handles zip and tar files? Andris Pavenis pointed me to UnZip first. Maybe I will switch unzipper or integrate unzipping routines into main program. >* Never use "Dj" - always use "dj" or "DJ". >* binaries should be *b.zip or *b.exe, not *x.exe OK... I thought 'x' would be good for SFX.