Date: Sun, 21 Mar 1999 04:11:40 -0500
Message-Id: <199903210911.EAA25153@mescaline.gnu.org>
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT gnu DOT org>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <199903181551.PAA77260@out4.ibm.net> (snowball3@usa.net)
Subject: Re: symlink question
References: <199903171807 DOT SAA76910 AT out5 DOT ibm DOT net> <199903181551 DOT PAA77260 AT out4 DOT ibm DOT net>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

   From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT usa DOT net>

   Since the only change I made was to the case of v2_prog == 0 and 
   when the source and dest were in the same directory, non-existing 
   files continue to work the same way as before the patch. Which is, to 
   generate a DJGPP-style symlink as if the file existed.

That's what I thought, but I was unsure whether I didn't miss
something.

But didn't you want to change the case of non-existent files so that
they called ink' as well?