Message-Id: <199903190421.EAA81076@out1.ibm.net>
From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT usa DOT net>
To: Frank Heckenbach <frank AT tim DOT gerwinski DOT de>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 1999 23:21:11 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: DJGPP preprocessor and link command specs
In-reply-to: <4D30E3B7.19990319003512.FOO-6CC6.frank@goedel.fjf.gnu.de>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

> So, are there any objections if we make the compiler dump
> LINK_COMMAND_SPECS, and if so, what kind of objections?

A few days ago I submitted a patch to the egcs-patches list to do just 
that and it was accepted. Look for it in egcs 1.2. I should point out it is a 
compiler issue and not a DJGPP one.

Mark

--- 
Mark Elbrecht, snowball3 AT usa DOT net
http://snowball.digitalspace.net/