X-Authentication-Warning: ieva01.lanet.lv: pavenis owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 21:05:37 +0200 (WET)
From: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP preprocessor and link command specs
In-Reply-To: <199903101813.NAA08250@envy.delorie.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.A41.4.05.9903102102270.32408-100000@ieva01.lanet.lv>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk



On Wed, 10 Mar 1999, DJ Delorie wrote:

> 
> gcc should dump the right specs, yes, so that external specs aren't
> required at all.  

It's so with DJGPP port of egcs-1.1.1 and should be so with upcomming
release of egcs-1.1.2

> However, if we choose to go this way, we should
> remove the DJGPP_MINOR definition (I don't see a djgpp 3.0 in the near
> or medium future, so that one can stay :)

It's removed already for some time (egcs-1.1.1, now uploaded binaries of
egcs-1.1.2-pre3). I put in builtin specs only definition of DJGPP=2


> 
> > I don't know what is supposed to be the right solution, but to me it
> > would seem most natural if the DJGPP compiler would dump exactly
> > those specs that it needs.
> 

Andris