Date: Wed, 10 Mar 1999 13:13:39 -0500 Message-Id: <199903101813.NAA08250@envy.delorie.com> X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f From: DJ Delorie To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com In-reply-to: <658F56E5.19990310190340.FOO-61CD.frank@goedel.fjf.gnu.de> (message from Frank Heckenbach on Wed, 10 Mar 1999 19:03:40 +0100) Subject: Re: DJGPP preprocessor and link command specs References: <658F56E5 DOT 19990310190340 DOT FOO-61CD DOT frank AT goedel DOT fjf DOT gnu DOT de> Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk gcc should dump the right specs, yes, so that external specs aren't required at all. However, if we choose to go this way, we should remove the DJGPP_MINOR definition (I don't see a djgpp 3.0 in the near or medium future, so that one can stay :) > I don't know what is supposed to be the right solution, but to me it > would seem most natural if the DJGPP compiler would dump exactly > those specs that it needs.