Date: Tue, 9 Mar 1999 14:35:02 -0500
Message-Id: <199903091935.OAA01235@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
CC: peter AT gerwinski DOT de, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, frank AT tim DOT gerwinski DOT de
In-reply-to: <B0000078968@stargate.astr.lu.lv> (pavenis@lanet.lv)
Subject: Re: Patch to simplify cross-building of GCC
References:  <B0000078968 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk


It seems we're letting egcs change the definition of our types.  In
general, I'd rather not let it do that.  Either the headers should be
fixed to remove bugs in the types (I don't believe there are any) or
the headers or egcs should be adjusted so that the "fixed" includes
don't interfere with them.  The ideal case is that no fixed includes
are required, and I'd rather not have a set of replacement headers in
the *standard* compiler for djgpp!