Date: Fri, 26 Feb 1999 19:11:35 -0500
Message-Id: <199902270011.TAA26338@envy.delorie.com>
X-Authentication-Warning: envy.delorie.com: dj set sender to dj AT envy DOT delorie DOT com using -f
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <199902262327.SAA11493@mccoy2.ECE.McGill.CA> (message from Alain
	Magloire on Fri, 26 Feb 1999 18:27:14 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: inetutils
References:  <199902262327 DOT SAA11493 AT mccoy2 DOT ECE DOT McGill DOT CA>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com


> So in other words, you're saying, it is not possible to port
> the inetutils servers, that rely on the operating system to provide
> some sort of multitasking via the system calls(fork/spwan,...).

If you don't mind the fact that only one service can run at a time,
you can do it.  You just can't interactively deal with the
stdin/stdout of the running program.