Message-Id: <199902112015.UAA35208@out2.ibm.net>
From: "Mark E." <snowball3 AT usa DOT net>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date: Thu, 11 Feb 1999 15:15:58 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: new Bash 2.02.1 test version available
References: <199902101956 DOT TAA74802 AT out1 DOT ibm DOT net>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.990211175717.10598C@is>
X-mailer: Pegasus Mail for Win32 (v3.01d)
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> I didn't yet test this too much, but I have one minor gripe: the default
> prompt is now "bash.exe-2.02$".  Could we possibly lose the .exe part? 

Done. While we're on annoyances...
Consider the PATH_EXPAND variable. Is there a time when a path 
shouldn't be expanded? If not, then shouldn't a command like 'ls 
//c/djgpp/bin' always have its argument fixed to 'c:/djgpp/bin'?

Mark

--- 
Mark Elbrecht snowball3 AT usa DOT net
http://members.xoom.com/snowball3/