From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id: <9812172253.AA15992@clio.rice.edu>
Subject: Re: patches to 2.02
To: adamtk AT altavista DOT net (Toshio 'ADAM' Kudo)
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 16:53:30 -0600 (CST)
Cc: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <199812171038.FAA04787@pop02.globecomm.net> from "Toshio 'ADAM' Kudo" at Dec 17, 98 07:38:24 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL20]
Content-Type: text
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

>   Because PC98's character code is not ASCII.

Would it make sense to make the character set changes run time comparisons
to see if it is a PC98 system?  I'm not sure if anyone is attached
to the "pretty" behavior on a standard PC.

I'm glad there is someone helping to support the PC98 architecture!