Date: Wed, 2 Dec 1998 20:29:38 -0500
Message-Id: <199812030129.UAA07539@envy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.981129150653.2340X-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Sun, 29 Nov 1998 15:11:36 +0200 (IST))
References:  <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 981129150653 DOT 2340X-100000 AT is>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com


>     How about renaming this to gpp.c, to avoid name confusion with the
>     one from gppNNNb.zip?

I fear this would cause other confusions too.  Best to leave things as
they are, so that the FAQs are at least correct.  We can poll the
djgpp forum after 2.02 and decide then what to do.

>     How about adding empty libgpp.a and libstdcxx.a to djdev, so that
>     users could compile with gxx (gpp) as well without getting error
>     messages?

No.  That would cause confusion for people who didn't download the
real C++ libraries, or installed djdev *after* lgp.