Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 10:31:58 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199810291531.KAA27934@indy.delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: [perron AT art DOT alcatel DOT fr: Re: DJGPP 2.02 Beta 981027]
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com


Should we remove them?  I've removed gcc-2.7.* from simtel.

------- Start of forwarded message -------
Return-Path: <djgpp-bounces>
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 1998 11:00:27 +0100 (MET)
From: Olivier Perron <perron AT art DOT alcatel DOT fr>
X-Sender: perron AT rtbsci143s
To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: DJGPP 2.02 Beta 981027
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Reply-To: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List: djgpp AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To: listserv AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

I'm resending this message as it seems that the first one did not arrive
to destination.

What should we do with the new specs and djgpp.djl files in %DJDIR/lib ?
I ask this question because installation instructions from gcc-2.8.1 tell
us:

"I also recommend remove files 'specs' and 'djgpp.djl' from %DJDIR/lib.
 Archive gcc281b.zip contains replacement for these files which will
 go to a different directory %DJDIR/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/2.81.
 If You have changed any of these 2 files You can consider to transfer
 these changes to new files. It is possible to avoid removing these files
 but don't do this unless You know what You are doing."

Olivier.
------- End of forwarded message -------