Message-ID: <3634A878.E04198B5@montana.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 1998 09:51:05 -0700
From: bowman <bowman AT montana DOT com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5b2 [en] (Win95; I)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: proposed change to autoconf macro
References: <199810261122 DOT MAA29344 AT mars DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com



Martin Stromberg wrote:
> 
> Hmm. Either UMSDOS has a feature that I don't know about (possible), or
> I can state that the DOZE-ness with "C:" et al. is of no concern in
> Linux's umsdos file system (likely).

This is really getting off topic, but I am curious. I put up Linux with
the
UMSDOS system on one of my machines, but have never had occasion to paw
around
the lower levels. Granted that a reference to a drive letter should
never be seen at
the makefile level, is there a layer where DOS style terminology is
used, or do
the Linux drivers completely supercede the bios?