From: Kbwms AT aol DOT com Message-ID: Date: Wed, 14 Oct 1998 16:27:36 EDT To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Mime-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: libc math function upgrade work Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: AOL 3.0 16-bit for Windows sub 38 Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subj: Re: libc math function upgrade work To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il (Eli Zaretskii) Dear Eli Zaretskii, On 10-14-98 at 08:38:04 EST you wrote: > > In my view, it is important to know how much speedup does one gain by > using this version as opposed to both libm and the current libc > versions. (I would expect to see a significant difference, at least > relative to libm.) Otherwise, the merits of getting current versions > replaced are not clear enough. IIRC, one of Eric's original goals for > doing all this work was to gain speed, so this aspect seems to be > important to Eric as well. > I will write an independent set of tests on both libraries and will send the results to you later this week or early next week. K.B. Williams