Date: Fri, 09 Oct 1998 09:09:04 -0500
From: Eric Rudd <rudd AT cyberoptics DOT com>
Subject: Re: libc math function upgrade work
To: Kbwms AT aol DOT com
Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Message-id: <361E1900.BC178C43@cyberoptics.com>
Organization: CyberOptics
MIME-version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (Win95; U)
Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
References: <5d383d06 DOT 361d591d AT aol DOT com>
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Kbwms AT aol DOT com wrote:

> Dear Eric Rudd,
>
> Appended are two reports in Cody-Waite table format that recap
> the results of tests on 14 of your functions.  These are the
> elementary math functions.
>
> In general, your functions perform as well or better on these
> tests than the equivalent functions in the new libm.a library.
> The exceptions are in the sine and cosine functions which do
> not perform adequately on large arguments.

Thank you for performing the tests on my library.  Where do we go from here?

-Eric Rudd
rudd AT cyberoptics DOT com