From: "Andrew Crabtree" <andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
To: <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: RE: Default alignment
Date: Tue, 6 Oct 1998 11:15:03 -0700
Message-ID: <000f01bdf155$3d352850$6dd22b0f@ros51675cra.rose.hp.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2377.0
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.981006143516.17118Y-100000@is>
X-Mimeole: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3155.0
Importance: Normal
Reply-To: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> be a good idea to define COFF_DEFAULT_SECTION_ALIGNMENT_POWER to make
> executable be aligned on more than 4 bytes (is 8 okay for a Pentium?)
I would agree.  Perhaps SET wants to comment on this?  I remember he went
through a lot with section alignment ~10 months ago but I didn't keep any
emails about it.

> unless [34]86 will be somehow punished by that.
nope.

> Btw, is somebody still working on porting Binutils 2.9?
http://www.goof.com/pcg/djgpp/djgpp.html
Assuming I can get everything working on NT.  I should know in a week or
two.

Andy