Date: Mon, 7 Sep 1998 12:56:03 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: (should be: egcs-1.1a uploaded)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.A32.3.91.980907114645.61918A-100000@ieva06.lanet.lv>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980907124930.23961D-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Mon, 7 Sep 1998, Andris Pavenis wrote:

> I didn't have any crashes (or other problems) with egcs-1.1 compiled using
> slightly patched DJDEV202

Crashes are not the only problems you could have from djdev202, and your 
system is only one of all possible combinations out there.  IMHO, 
djdev202 is not tested enough yet to be used in production-quality 
software.  A combination of a (possibly) buggy compiler with a (possibly) 
buggy library used to build that compiler, and a (possibly) buggy code 
you compile with that compiler is IMHO too much for many programmers, 
even the adventurous ones ;-).

> So I suggest that we can release it as it is without rebuilding. I
> only need to modify archive gcc-e11b.zip to have support of djdev201.

It's up to you.  You asked for opinions and I gave you mine.