Date: Tue, 18 Aug 1998 19:23:03 -0400 (EDT)
Message-Id: <199808182323.TAA03258@delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <E0z8uWH-0006PM-00@sable.ox.ac.uk>
	(george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk)
Subject: Re: djlsr and include files
Precedence: bulk


> Is it not true that using djgpp v2.01 to build v2.02 is more like a
> cross compilation than a native build (since ultimately you're not
> linking to the v2.01 libraries at all)?  Perhaps djlsr+djcrx is a
> better choice for this than djlsr+djdev, if for some reason
> (redundancy of information in the download?) you don't want to use
> djdev.  djcrx is a lot smaller, though it still contains binaries
> (e.g. compiled libraries) of course.

If you don't download djdev, you won't have a compiler to build with.