Message-Id: Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" Organization: INTI To: Bill Currie , Eli Zaretskii , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Thu, 23 Jul 1998 14:44:38 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Ispell and pipes In-reply-to: <35B706F4.CEF60470@taniwha.tssc.co.nz> Precedence: bulk Bill Currie wrote: > [sorry about coming in late on this one, but I've been having alot of > problems with email (until tonight-I finally got my mail working again) > and a lot of mail got bounced (I appologise for any inconvenience > caused)] > > Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote: > > > > Eli Zaretskii wrote: > > > > > > > > On Wed, 22 Jul 1998, Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET) wrote: > > > > > > > I remmember I had some success using the Bill's driver that makes the > > > > transfer buffer shared. But that's slow and needs the driver loaded. > > Hmm, why is it slow? Because the applications makes some polls in the transfer buffer, perhaps that isn't important in some cases, but when I tried a simple program that transfers the keystrokes to the other (you type in one DOS Box and you see the letters in the other ;-) I saw it was slow. > How are you implementing your multi-tasking? What Eli suggested and what I used for this experiment is Winblows. > Are > you doing the IOCTL (?? been too long since I looked at the code) every > time you use the buffer? No. > You don't have to as it's not going to move > about in memory. The programs just call ioctl ones and then use the shared transfer buffer. > > > > > > This mechanism will be used in interactive programs and in applications > > > like an editor which lets the compiler run in the background. For > > > example, Emacs' support for async subprocesses is implemented so that the > > > output from a subprocess is only read if Emacs is idle. This means that > > > if you are a very fast typist, or if you invoke a command that takes a > > > long time to finish, you can almost block the compiler messages from being > > > displayed in the compilation buffer. And yet when I use these Emacs > > > facilities on Unix, I hardly see any slow-down. > > > > > > So I don't think speed is so much important in this case. > > > > But you are overlooking some very important fact: pipes are fast in > > UNIX the methode I tried to comunicate 2 programs could be *very* > > slow for small transfers. > > But if you want to implement it is ok ;-) > > Hey!! *I'm* interested in seeing what you've done. I would like to see > that driver being used for something. I no longer have a use for it > (Windows is banned from the house and I don't use dos much anymore, so > guess:), but I am certainly willing to pitch in with any help I can > give. I may even be able to do some testing at work (I use a sun > workstation, but there are others with w95 that may be willing to let me > do some testing A/H). If you want I can search where is a copy of it, but I think the int 31h or the direct longjmp solutions are better because they work in DOS. SET ------------------------------------ 0 -------------------------------- Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/ or http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/ Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer) Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org ICQ: 2951574 Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA TE: +(541) 759 0013