Sender: nate AT cartsys DOT com
Message-ID: <359C25BB.C9E03A58@cartsys.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Jul 1998 17:28:43 -0700
From: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT tssc DOT co DOT nz>
CC: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com,
        dj AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Cross-compiling djlsr
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980702134233 DOT 17177G-100000 AT is> <359B6F28 DOT 8B5EA152 AT taniwha DOT tssc DOT co DOT nz>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Bill Currie wrote:
> 
> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > I know nothing about DJGPP cross-compile setup, but why do you need to
> > mix DJGPP and local headers to compile djasm?  It is IMHO a very bad
> > idea, and the problem you've described might as well be the tip of an
> > iceberg.
> 
> Moot point (wrt djasm), djasm has been ported to Linux (see my djasm
> patches messages), and DJ has applied the patches.

True, but djasm builds as part of the djlsr build process, and when it
aborts, there you are.  At least some Makefile hacking would be
required.
-- 

Nate Eldredge
nate AT cartsys DOT com