Message-Id: Comments: Authenticated sender is From: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" Organization: INTI To: Eli Zaretskii , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Date: Mon, 29 Jun 1998 15:38:52 +0000 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Subject: Re: Windows 9X/NT file times In-reply-to: Precedence: bulk Eli Zaretskii wrote: > This message summarizes what I've learned. At the end of the message > you will find two test programs which I used to find out the facts. I > would like to ask those who have access to Windows 9X/NT systems to > please run the programs and report results. I only have access to > Windows 95 version 4.00.950 (where the above warning from Make doesn't > happen), so information about any other versions will be most > appreciated. Thanks in advance. 4.00.950 have 450 more bugs than OSR 2.0 according M$ ;-) > Since libc functions only support DOS 2-sec granularity of file times, > I decided to use raw Int 21h calls to get the best time resolution I > can have. The first test program below will allow you to display the 3 > time stamps of every file on its command line. At least on my version > of Windows, the last-access time is actually only the date (the time > is zero), I'll run your test, but right now I can inform you that under v4.00.1111 the second value *have* time so I guess it was one of the 400 bugs ;-)) SET ------------------------------------ 0 -------------------------------- Visit my home page: http://set-soft.home.ml.org/ or http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Vista/6552/ Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET). (Electronics Engineer) Alternative e-mail: set-soft AT usa DOT net set AT computer DOT org ICQ: 2951574 Address: Curapaligue 2124, Caseros, 3 de Febrero Buenos Aires, (1678), ARGENTINA TE: +(541) 759 0013