Message-Id: <199806250322.EAA00310@sable.ox.ac.uk>
Comments: Authenticated sender is <mert0407 AT sable DOT ox DOT ac DOT uk>
From: George Foot <george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk>
To: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
Date: Thu, 25 Jun 1998 04:17:37 +0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: DJGPP v2.01 malloc wasting 4Kb
Reply-to: george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk
CC: "Salvador Eduardo Tropea (SET)" <salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar>,
        djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Precedence: bulk

On 24 Jun 98 at 13:17, Nate Eldredge wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > For example, what's with the portability-related addition to the
> > docs?
> 
> Umm.  That kind of stalled, but I'm looking at getting it moving
> again. I believe George had made a better patch to `mkdoc' for the
> macros.  I sent him a mail asking for it; he hasn't responded yet. 
> After that, assuming we can resolve the burning philosophical and
> syntactical issues that bogged it down before, work can start.  I
> should have a fair amount of time to work on it. -- 

Sorry, I don't remember receiving that email.  IIRC, we were in some
disagreement about whether it was better to use macros in mkdoc or
macros in Texinfo.  If we decide to use mkdoc, I'll check the
archives to see where we got to and make sure my copy does do what
it should, then send patches.  I think some of the concepts in the
"better patch" were rejected, so I'll change them first. 
-- 
george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk