Date: Thu, 18 Jun 1998 09:40:52 +0300 (IDT)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Nate Eldredge <nate AT cartsys DOT com>
cc: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, salvador AT inti DOT gov DOT ar,
        djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
Subject: Re: NULL redefined in djgpp headers
In-Reply-To: <358889B3.FB4913DB@cartsys.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980618093936.23527C-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 17 Jun 1998, Nate Eldredge wrote:

> > It's worse to #define something and then #include the header that ANSI
> > says is responsible for that symbol.
> 
> Then maybe, instead of continually going around and around here, someone
> should bring it up on gnu.g++.bug.

This is an okay suggestion, but it would be mighty nice if the DJGPP
binary distributions were also corrected in the same way we suggest
the GNU maintainers to fix this problem.  Such a basic problem should
not wait until the next libg++ release, IMHO.