From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-ID: <B0000032033@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 1998 21:50:10 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Possible update of gcc-2.8.1 archives
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References: <B0000031884 AT stargate DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv>
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980608191221.11424F-100000@is>
Precedence: bulk

Date sent:      	Mon, 8 Jun 1998 19:12:42 +0300 (IDT)
From:           	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Subject:        	Re: Possible update of gcc-2.8.1 archives

> 
> On Fri, 5 Jun 1998 pavenis AT lanet DOT lv wrote:
> 
> > The only problem is that the version is not changed so we'll have the 
> > same archive names.
> 
> This is the usual problem with DJGPP uploads.  I don't think you
> should be worried about it, since every other package does the same
> when severe bugs are found.
> 

I had one more question here:
 
How to name archives of g77? (I uploaded them as g770523b and g770523s)
At least binary release is bind with gcc281b.zip and one should rebuild
it when gcc-2.8.2 will be out.