From: pavenis AT lanet DOT lv
Message-ID: <B0000031914@stargate.astr.lu.lv>
To: "DJGPP Workers Mailing List" <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>,
        <andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Date: Sat, 6 Jun 1998 19:30:22 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: bnu-2.91 
In-reply-to: <000001bd909f$649a5e40$45111d0f@ros51675cra.rose.hp.com>
Precedence: bulk

Subject:        	bnu-2.91 
Date sent:      	Fri, 5 Jun 1998 09:31:29 -0700

> Hey Guys - I have uploaded a first try at the binutils 2.9.1 binary package.
> It is currently available from
> 
> ftp://www.goof.com/pub/pcg/private/andrew/bnu291b.zip
> 
> Its possible it might be automoved into this directory
> 
> http://www.goof.com/pcg/data/djgpp/
> 
> but it appears the cron job is busted right now.  I know that there are some
> severe documentation shortcomings with this version, but I hope that that is
> the only problem.  The only differences (djgpp specific) from 2.8.1 are
> fixing the local label problem, and changing the built in linker scripts.
> Note that I have not addressed the assembler problem reported to djgpp
> recently.  That user had EOF characters embedded in coments, which gas does
> not like.  He said it occurred with all characters above 127 (I think) but
> it appears to be a problem only with EOF character.
> 

Looks like You forgot to patch AS not to include in object files info about
temporary labels. As I can see all 'XXXXXXXX t   L???' is still in output of NM.
So I'm temporary returning to 2.8.1. At least no other visible problems in
first 20 minutes (building gcc-2.8.1 together with g77)
 
Andris