Message-Id: <199804211148.NAA34074@ieva06.lanet.lv>
From: "Andris Pavenis" <pavenis AT lanet DOT lv>
To: Vik Heyndrickx <Vik DOT Heyndrickx AT rug DOT ac DOT be>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 1998 13:46:55 +0300
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Subject: Re: Temporary files for gcc-2.81
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <353C74B9.7C8@rug.ac.be>
Precedence: bulk

Date sent:      	Tue, 21 Apr 1998 12:28:09 +0200
From:           	Vik Heyndrickx <Vik DOT Heyndrickx AT rug DOT ac DOT be>
Subject:        	Re: Temporary files for gcc-2.81


Hi!

> I tested it in DOS 3.3, DOS 6.22 (non-multitaskers are generally not a
> problem), Win 3.1 standard mode, Win 3.1 enhanced mode, Win 4.00.95b and
> Win NT 4.0. While looking at the sources of DosEMU it should also work
> there (untested, if someone could...) and if it would not be supported,
> I may have it supported by the DosEMU people. 
> It is likely to work under OS/2, and even if it would not work as
> expected it would still have a backup method that makes it very unlikely
> of loosing unicity.
> In general it is extemily reliable.
> 

Perhaps I would be able to try to check it under DOSEMU. If the source
can be compiled with BC and TASM then I don't see big problems.
Only when I tried to run 2 DOSEMU sessions simultanously previous time
I got Linux crashing... 

One more version of DOS with own multitasker is Caldera DR-OpenDOS.
I hope there also will be no problems. 

> Now I just need to get into a DJGPP program...

This all perhaps will not go in final port of gcc-2.8.1 for DJGPP. Perhaps 
the version I'm building now may became the release unless I'll find 
something bad there.

Andris