Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 13:34:10 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: Bill Currie <bill AT taniwha DOT tssc DOT co DOT nz>
cc: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: mkstemp made safer
In-Reply-To: <350664A6.F1A94BA5@taniwha.tssc.co.nz>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980311133223.7959F-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Wed, 11 Mar 1998, Bill Currie wrote:

> Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > They are the same.  I'm used to use DENY_ALL, but the headers define
> > SH_DENYRW.  If I'm the only one who uses DENY_ALL as a matter of speech,
> > please tell me and I will change the docs.
> 
> Just put an AKA (also known as) in the docs as I imagine SH_DENYRW is
> unix and DENY_ALL is DOS (doesn't RBIL use DENY_ALL?).

SH_DENYRW is NOT a unixism, it's a DOS name.  RBIL uses DENYALL, but is 
that enough to mention that term in the docs?