Date: Wed, 11 Mar 1998 13:27:22 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii To: Bill Currie cc: Vik Heyndrickx , djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: Temporary files considered unsafe In-Reply-To: <35066048.AB7DCC1A@taniwha.tssc.co.nz> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 11 Mar 1998, Bill Currie wrote: > ARE there 64 valid chars in a dos file name??? (ie 7bit) 8 bit gets > messy due to dos converting lowercase chars to upper `randomly' based on > the current code page (I assume dos goes by code page, I KNOW it > converts them). Sorry, I don't quite get you here. Are you talking about the conversion done by Windows 9X to generate the 8+3 alias for a long name? If not, which conversion did you have in mind? > Hey, why not something like Robert Hoehne did in RHIDE, use tempory > directories in the temp dir, only the dir name is a direct sprintf of > the vmid, then ALL temp files are put in the appropriate sub dir. The unique PID is needed not only for temporary files.