Message-ID: <34FD9224.65C4698D@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 04 Mar 1998 18:40:52 +0100
From: Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>
Organization: none provided
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: GCC 2.8.1 is released
References: <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 980304170203 DOT 7496F-100000 AT is>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Precedence: bulk

Eli Zaretskii wrote :
> 
> I saw the announcement about 2.8.1 being released.  Seems like we are in
> for some more work, eh?

What a thing. Even about 2 minutes ago I mailed to DJ that I have
uploaded
the final gcc 2.8.0 archives to his incoming and now I read your mail.

> Robert, if you get to building this, could you please see whether your
> patch about the .exe suffix got into the release?  I couldn't understand

I will get it the next time and see.

> what was the final decision of Richard Kenner, but I'm afraid he didn't
> agree with what I tried to convince him.

I aggree with you that I do also not understand his opinion but I will
see how it is solved.

I think for now we should use the gcc 2.8.0 I have uploaded because it
seems to be stable and when I have the time, I will see what the
advantages
of gcc 2.8.1 are, or maybe someone else makes the gcc 2.8.1 port since
it should be no big problem after gcc 2.8.0 for DJGPP is now out.

Robert
-- 
******************************************************
* email:   Robert Hoehne <robert DOT hoehne AT gmx DOT net>     *
* Post:    Am Berg 3, D-09573 Dittmannsdorf, Germany *
* WWW:     http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~sho/rho        *
******************************************************