Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 20:27:28 -0500 (EST)
Message-Id: <199803020127.UAA03773@delorie.com>
From: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>
To: eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il
CC: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980301131058.13547F-100000@is> (message from Eli
	Zaretskii on Sun, 1 Mar 1998 13:11:39 +0200 (IST))
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Portability section for libc docs
Precedence: bulk


> I think most DOS compilers are so similar in the contents of their C
> libraries (they all emulate MSC), that it is usually enough to have
> one category.  The intent is to tell people what is a de-facto
> standard across DOS C compilers.

I recall a number of functions that were added "for Borland
compatibility" (like _bios_*).  Does MS have those also?