Date: Sun, 1 Mar 1998 13:12:20 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: George Foot <george DOT foot AT merton DOT oxford DOT ac DOT uk>
cc: DJ Delorie <dj AT delorie DOT com>, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: Suggestion: Portability section for libc docs
In-Reply-To: <Pine.OSF.3.95.980227051636.6178I-100000@sable.ox.ac.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980301131200.13547G-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, George Foot wrote:

> Watcom?  I suggest the version number (if any) be separated from the
> token, e.g. "msc(7)" or "bc(3.1)" if those versions exist.  We can then
> append the version to the `nice' output string making "Microsoft C 7" or
> "Borland C 3.1", for instance.

IMHO, this is *way* too gross.  It goes a long way towards documenting
other compilers, which we don't want and don't really need.