Message-ID: <19980225131325.23019@beeblebrox> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:13:25 +0100 From: Laszlo Molnar To: Robert Hoehne Cc: DJGPP Workers List Subject: Re: GCC 2.8.0 for DJGPP References: <34E36D6C DOT 89DD0CAA AT gmx DOT net> <19980217133555 DOT 54442 AT beeblebrox> <34EECD00 DOT 51375E30 AT gmx DOT net> <19980224133528 DOT 44278 AT beeblebrox> <34F2FF85 DOT C685CD6F AT gmx DOT net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <34F2FF85.C685CD6F@gmx.net>; from Robert Hoehne on Tue, Feb 24, 1998 at 06:12:37PM +0100 Precedence: bulk On Tue, Feb 24, 1998 at 06:12:37PM +0100, Robert Hoehne wrote: > > I think gcc should start the new cpp and cc1, so you could move them > > to bin/djgpp/2.80/ or you might change the directory order. > > Yes, this might be possible, but I do not want to do so, because > I want to have now slowly a configuration of the directories like > it is common for the GNU packages. That means I would be glad if > we would have sometimes all the files in nearly exact the same > places like they will be installed with > > make install Ok, but this is a small performance hit. Two other directories are scanned by gcc, before it finds cpp and cc1. This is the only reason I suggested directory search reordering. But if this is hard to do, I can live with that. > > ps: my djgpp.env contains the following lines in [gcc]: > > > > [gcc] > > COMPILER_PATH=%/>;COMPILER_PATH%%DJDIR%/bin > > LIBRARY_PATH=%/>;LIBRARY_PATH%%DJDIR%/lib > > Yes I know about this, and this is probably the reason. When setting > the $COMPILER_PATH, gcc will search there first before in directory > where I placed the compilers. COMPILER_PATH is not set by me. So gcc only sees $DJDIR/bin. But why $DJDIR/bin/djgpp/2.80 is scanned first? > > ps2: the last 2 pathnames look strange for me... > Why this? I mean these: >c:/djgpp/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/2.80/$DJDIR/djgpp/bin/djgpp/2.80/cpp.exe, >c:/djgpp/lib/gcc-lib/djgpp/2.80/$DJDIR/djgpp/bin/cpp.exe, ^^^^^^^^ Laszlo