Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 19:05:42 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <199802240305.TAA28177@adit.ap.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" To: George Foot From: Nate Eldredge Subject: Re: Suggestion: Portability section for libc docs Cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Precedence: bulk At 06:26 2/23/1998 +0000, George Foot wrote: >We get back to the question: "Who is writing this information?". The only >information that everybody can supply is the ANSI/POSIX information, based >upon djgpp's header files. Other information can only be added by people >with access to the relevant compilers. Perhaps it would be best to begin >by simply adding the ANSI/POSIX information, and adding the other >information to the .txh files in a second pass, done by people with access >to each compiler. That is sensible. >Using the macros I just suggested this could be fairly simple to automate >(search for @node , then find the next @portability_end, then >add the relevant information before that line). The fact that the .txh files are all short helps, too. >Perhaps we should find out how many people will be working on this fairly >soon, though, and which systems they can compare with. I've had offers from various people, although for many it wasn't clear exactly how much work they'd be able to put into it. Here's a list of volunteers and systems, however. Me Linux, TC++ 1.01 :), FreeBSD 2.0.5 (4.4 BSD Lite) if necessary (I have a CDROM of it) Tom Demmer TC 2.0, IBM AIX Eli BC <= 3.1, SunOS 4.x, SunOS 5.x, Alpha/Unix, Linux George Digital Unix/Alpha, Linux Andrew Crabtree HPUX 9 and 10 Cesar Scarpini Rabak Borland C/C++ 4.5 Hopefully this will give us an idea of what we have to work with. So I guess the next thing to do is to implement the `mkdoc' macros so we know what to write. Nate Eldredge eldredge AT ap DOT net