From: Andrew Crabtree <andrewc AT typhoon DOT rose DOT hp DOT com>
Message-Id: <199802030001.AA211414084@typhoon.rose.hp.com>
Subject: Re: iostream concern
To: dj AT delorie DOT com (DJ Delorie)
Date: Mon, 02 Feb 1998 16:01:24 PST
Cc: andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-Reply-To: <199802022328.SAA17108@delorie.com>; from "DJ Delorie" at Feb 2, 98 6:28 pm
Reply-To: andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com
Precedence: bulk


> > So perhaps its our stdio which needs fixing.
> Our stdio.h works just fine with *our* stddef.h.
Right - I was just suggesting that since the standard (C9x draft anyway), 
specifies that size_t is to be defined in stddef.h instead of stdio.h,
that if we fix that there won't be a conflict.  I don't think we should
actually use the gcc stddef, but it would be nice if it didn't
crash things when bootstrapping the compiler.  

> If gcc produces a stddef.h that doesn't work with the other djgpp 
> headers, then we shouldn't use it.
I found the original message from Jeff L with a suggestion so I will
look into that.