Date: Mon, 2 Feb 1998 20:23:01 +0200 (IST)
From: Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
To: andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com
cc: djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject: Re: iostream concern
In-Reply-To: <199801291756.AA153226561@typhoon.rose.hp.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.980202202229.19322l-100000@is>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk


On Thu, 29 Jan 1998, Andrew Crabtree wrote:

> 1) The ansi checking is getting better in newer versions of gcc so its 
> possible that headers that you think are ansi compliant actually aren't
> (like the c++ incompatibility with exception)

This should be fixed in DJGPP's headers anyway, so fixincludes is
superflous.

> 2) Some header use internal gcc things that can change between releases
> (like using gnu_va_arglist instead of the regular ansi definition)

I doubt we use more than a couple of these.