Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 11:33:41 +0200 (IST) From: Eli Zaretskii To: Robert Hoehne cc: andrewc AT rosemail DOT rose DOT hp DOT com, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com Subject: Re: iostream concern In-Reply-To: <34CFA8EE.D826946F@gmx.net> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Precedence: bulk On Wed, 28 Jan 1998, Robert Hoehne wrote: > Since there were in the > past some problems with it, I would include libstdcxx.a in gpp280b.zip > and would have in lgpp280b.zip only libgxx.a . Are you agree? Seems like a good idea: one less zip file to download to get the standard stuff, and leaving the LGPL'ed stuff separate. > As you could see, I have changed the libgpp.a to libgxx.a. Is this a > problem in general? I suggest to leave the original name. It is too entrenched in DJGPP, and people would need to remember to delete the old versions if you change the name. Too much hassle. > And BTW: I will configure gcc (or better cpp) to have $DJDIR/include/gxx > as default directories for C++ headers and not $DJDIR/lang/cxx. If this > will make trouble, please let me know. I would say don't do that, unless you have *really* good reasons. For starters, people who keep an old DJGPP.ENV will have trouble.