Date: Tue, 27 Jan 1998 18:46:07 +0100 (MET)
From: Hans-Bernhard Broeker <broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de>
To: molnarl AT cdata DOT tvnet DOT hu
cc: DJGPP Workers List <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject: Re: off topic: ix86-pc-msdosdjgpp
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.95.980127181508.18936A-100000@dumballah.tvnet.hu>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.93.980127184248.7865C-100000@acp3bf>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Precedence: bulk

On Tue, 27 Jan 1998 molnarl AT cdata DOT tvnet DOT hu wrote:

> I saw this `ix86-pc-msdosdjgpp' in some recent posts. My only
> question is the 'msdos' part. Why must this name contain 'ms'?
> DJGPP works on other DOSes doesn't it?

Of course, but there also things called 'DOS' that don't have even a
slight similarity with what we know as DOS. For an example, I think some
subsystem of the Amiga OS is usually called 'DOS'. 

And of course, even if not all DOSes of today come directly from Redmond,
it's still M$ that defines the standards in this area.  In a certain
sense, this DOS is exactly what M$ decides to call DOS. Not more, not
less. Even the other producers of DOSes still (have to) stick to M$'s
original API, which is what actually makes out DOS. 

Hans-Bernhard Broeker (broeker AT physik DOT rwth-aachen DOT de)
Even if all the snow were burnt, ashes would remain.